Somewhat OT: copyright question

[Joe Fish]

Sorry, just lurking in this discussion, and I know this was just a typo 
(since "liable" is spelled correctly plenty of times in the post), but I 
thought its placement in the post was particularly funny:

On 6/14/05, Jonathan Hutchins <hutchins at tarcanfel.org> wrote:
<snip> 

.... established, in large part through suits against AOL, that the
> Operators were not labile, provided they ...
> 

<snip>

.... since I knew quite a few BBS operators "back in the day" and all of 
them most certainly WERE
"labile"<http://www.cogsci.princeton.edu/cgi-bin/webwn2.1?s=labile>....

;^)





JOE
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://kclug.org/pipermail/kclug/attachments/20050615/f3367084/attachment.htm