GPL Terms (Was: AMIOPEN: etc....)

[Monty Harder]

8/21/01 10:18:28 AM, "Duston, Hal" <hdusto01 at sprintspectrum.com> wrote:

>Monty,
>
>I think I can simplify.  If you give some one access to a
>binary file that contains GPL'd software that you have 
>modified, _then_ you have to give _them_ the modifications 
>that you have made.  You have to permit them to redistribute 
>the modifications under the GPL.  

  If their "access" is from a terminal that has no memory into which to load the binary, does that 
qualify?